When code needs a human eye, grade it fast

You have 200 submissions and four TAs. Divide the work randomly or assign specific students to each grader. Each TA sees only their pile, so nobody wastes time on submissions that are already handled.

Want TAs to see each other's grading for calibration? Turn that on. Prefer blind grading where TAs work independently? Keep it off. You decide how the team works together.

• Assign graders randomly or manually
• Each TA sees only their assigned submissions
• Configure whether graders can see each other's work

Click "next ungraded" and you're looking at the next submission that needs your attention. No scrolling through lists, no checking which ones are done. CodeGrade tracks what's been graded and what hasn't, so you always know where you stand.

When you're grading at scale, staying organized matters as much as giving good feedback. The review interface keeps you moving.

• Jump to the next ungraded submission with one click
• See at a glance which students still need grading
• Navigate between submissions without losing your place

Not every assignment is fully automatable. Sometimes you need the autograder to check if the code compiles and passes tests, but you also want a human to review code quality, design decisions, or documentation.

CodeGrade lets you combine both. The autograder handles the automated checks, and you or your TAs review the parts that need a human eye. One assignment, one grade, both approaches.

• Auto-grade the automatable parts, manually review the rest
• Both scores combine into a single grade per student
• Free for courses up to 50 students. No trial, no expiration.